romanywitch: (Default)
romanywitch ([personal profile] romanywitch) wrote in [community profile] fandomhigh2006-02-02 10:19 am
Entry tags:

Psych 101 (Thursday, (02/02/2006, 5th Period)

CLASS IS CLOSED.
The door's closed to minimize disruptions from the hallway. Today? Coffee and a bunch of fresh fruit. "All right, behavioral psych. Basically? Someone said, 'Hey, we can study behavior without going into all the deep thought of why they think the way they do.' Some of the big names of behavioral psych are Ivan Pavlov, the guy who's famous for the salivating dog experiment; John B. Watson, who hoped to make psychology a discipline focused solely on empirical evidence and not on thought patterns; and B.F. Skinner, who is, sadly, not the hot A.D. from The X-Files, damn it who gave behavioral psych a large part of its ethical grounding.

Now I'm going to go straight to operant and classical conditioning, as that's what you guys seemed the most interested in when we covered the basics of psychological perspectives.

Okay, everyone who's had a pet knows that they come running when they hear the sound they most commonly associate with a meal, like shaking the food bag or the electric can opener, right? If you say no, then I assume you have the most idiotic pet in the world, because stimulus-response is not something that requires much in the way of thought patterns.

I bring this up because that's the essence of classical conditioning. Stimulus-response. You pair two stimuli together. Ring a bell at the same time as you give a dog food. He salivates due to the food. Eventually, you take away the food and just ring the bell, and guess what? The dog still drools. Believe it or not, this discovery is what made Pavlov famous and is why classical conditioning is also known as Pavlovian conditioning. Classical conditioning generally deals with involuntary behavior.

The next one, operant conditioning, was researched most by B.F. Skinner, and deals far more with shaping voluntary behavior. It deals primarily with reinforcement--that is, a consequence that causes a behavior to recur more frequently--and punishment--a consequence that that causes a behavior to occur with less frequency. Pair up reinforcement and punishment with positive and negative consequences--positive meaning something added and negative meaning something taken away--and you've got the four primary methods of reinforcement for operant conditioning. I've got them copy/pasted from wiki written on the board."

Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior (response) is followed by a pleasant stimulus that rewards it. In the Skinner box experiment, positive reinforcement is the rat pressing a lever and receiving a food reward.

Negative reinforcement occurs when a behavior (response) is followed by an unpleasant stimulus being removed. In the Skinner box experiment, negative reinforcement is a loud noise continuously sounding inside the rat's cage until it presses the lever, when the noise ceases.

Positive punishment is an aversive stimulus, such as introducing a shock or loud noise.

Negative punishment or extinction removes a pleasant stimulus, such as taking away a child's toy. This occurs when a behavior (response) that had previously been followed by a pleasant stimulus is followed by no stimulus at all. In the Skinner box experiment, this is the rat pushing the lever and being rewarded with a food pellet several times, and then pushing the lever again and never receiving a food pellet again. Eventually the rat would learn that no food would come, and would cease pushing the lever.


"One of the assumptions of many behaviorists is that free will is illusory, and that all behavior is determined by a combination of forces comprised of genetic factors and the environment, either through association or reinforcement. Based on what we've gone over today on classical and operant conditioning, do you guys agree? Or not? Or do you have other questions?"

Useful Links:
Ms. Calendar's Voice Mail
Ms. Calendar's E-Mail
Wikipedia - Behavioral Psychology
Wikipedia - Classical Conditioning
Wikipedia - Operant Conditioning


{{OOC: OCD comment threads going up shortly are up.}}

Re: Sign-In

[identity profile] notcalledlizzie.livejournal.com 2006-02-02 07:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Elizabeth signed in.
stykera: (Default)

Re: Sign-In

[personal profile] stykera 2006-02-03 04:31 am (UTC)(link)
Stark signed in.
fates_jaye: (Default)

Re: Sign-In

[personal profile] fates_jaye 2006-02-03 05:05 am (UTC)(link)
Jaye signs in.

Re: Sign-In

[identity profile] krycek-rat.livejournal.com 2006-02-04 02:13 am (UTC)(link)
Krycek signed in.

Re: Discussion - Today's Topic: Behavioral Psychology

[identity profile] notcalledlizzie.livejournal.com 2006-02-02 07:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Elizabeth snickered. "When we had two dogs, all we had to do was get two small plates out of the cupboard, and they'd come running; even if they were up the back of the garden," she said.

"I would say that we still have free will. We are conditioned to a certain extent, but what happens when we're in a situation that's completely alien to us?"

Re: Discussion - Today's Topic: Behavioral Psychology

[identity profile] notcalledlizzie.livejournal.com 2006-02-02 08:20 pm (UTC)(link)
"What about if it involves actual aliens?" Elizabeth asked innocently.

Re: Discussion - Today's Topic: Behavioral Psychology

[identity profile] notcalledlizzie.livejournal.com 2006-02-02 09:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Elizabeth masked her reactions. There were still some aspects of Fandom Ms Calendar had yet to discover.

She just nodded.
stykera: (creepy)

Re: Discussion - Today's Topic: Behavioral Psychology

[personal profile] stykera 2006-02-03 04:54 am (UTC)(link)
Stark blinked.

"Do you not think aliens exist?"

Re: Discussion - Today's Topic: Behavioral Psychology

[identity profile] krycek-rat.livejournal.com 2006-02-04 02:31 am (UTC)(link)
Krycek listened to the conversation, but didn't seem inclined to add anything despite the vaguely unsettled expression on his face.
stykera: (Default)

Re: Discussion - Today's Topic: Behavioral Psychology

[personal profile] stykera 2006-02-03 04:48 am (UTC)(link)
"I don't think that means we don't have free will. Don't like that idea. At all. Can't you choose to go against your conditioning, at least sometimes?"
fates_jaye: (Default)

Re: Discussion - Today's Topic: Behavioral Psychology

[personal profile] fates_jaye 2006-02-03 05:07 am (UTC)(link)
Jaye shrugs. "it's like the commercial with the guys who go sprinting for the door when they hear the doorbell because they assume it's pizza. They're used to it being one way, but they're really only getting up because they're idiots."
fates_jaye: (Default)

Re: Discussion - Today's Topic: Behavioral Psychology

[personal profile] fates_jaye 2006-02-03 02:58 pm (UTC)(link)
"I'm blaming you when they call the cops on me."

Re: Discussion - Today's Topic: Behavioral Psychology

[identity profile] krycek-rat.livejournal.com 2006-02-04 02:39 am (UTC)(link)
"I agree that conditioning influences people in their everyday lives, but once you leave that behind - when you find yourself in situations that you have no context for - I think it only has a cursory influence." He frowned slightly. "I don't like to think that we don't have free will, honestly. Yet another case for personal responsibility. If conditioning guides everything you do, then nothing's your fault."