http://emoclops.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] emoclops.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] fandomhigh2012-01-13 07:09 am
Entry tags:

Leadership, Friday, 3rd Period

"Good afternoon, class," Scott said. "One thing you have to figure out quickly is what kind of leader you want to be. Essentially, what's your leadership philosophy? TAs, please pass out this handout."

"Your leadership philosophy informs what you want to accomplish, how you want to do it, and what outside factors will influence your decisions," Scott said. "This isn't something to take lightly because if your team follows your orders, they may be essentially letting you control their short-term futures and perhaps even their morals. So as you develop your philosophy, you need to look at a combination of vision and values."

"Your vision is, essentially, what the Army Field Manual calls commander's intent. As defined by the Army, this is your Purpose (the unifying focus of a task), Method (how you want people to go about their jobs), and Endstate (what your ideal final outcome is). Once you have those three things worked out, you have - at least on an intellectual level - a idea of how you want to lead. To be a successful leader, you need to communicate your vision so your whole team knows what it is you want to do. We'll get into that more in future weeks. For now, you just want to recognize what your vision is."

"But something else enters into it. Values. Things like loyalty to your friends and to your mission, respect for yourself and others, selflessness to put others before you, and integrity to do what you feel is right. Where you stand on those issues and more will influence how you deal with your subordinates and how you'll set your own vision."

"Taking us out of the realm of the vague, undefined situations last week, I've prepared a few scenarios I'd like you to think about. Pick one or two, discuss it with your classmates if need be, and consider how you would want a generic team you put together to proceed per your vision and values. You can use friends or classmates as a template for the kind of team you would have if that makes it easier for you, but I want you to make this as universal as you can. After all, if your strategy involves letting one friend who can solve every issue easily do just that without orders, you're not really leading. You're just letting." Like, letting Wolverine do whatever he wants, Professor X.`
wwiii: (Longing)

Re: Sign In

[personal profile] wwiii 2012-01-14 12:00 am (UTC)(link)
Warren Worthington III
glacial_queen: (Thoughtful)

Re: Sign In

[personal profile] glacial_queen 2012-01-14 05:49 am (UTC)(link)
Karla
wrongkindofsith: (Pretty sure you're insane)

Re: Listen to the Lecture

[personal profile] wrongkindofsith 2012-01-13 02:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Cara looked over the handout with bafflement. What kind of warriors needed to have it explained to them how their leader wanted them to follow orders.

Re: Listen to the Lecture

[identity profile] shestheworst.livejournal.com 2012-01-13 05:13 pm (UTC)(link)
As soon as the military started factoring into things, Britta narrowed her eyes in deep suspicion and immediate skepticism. She was not about to let herself go along easily with something constructed by the government.

Re: Scenario 1

[identity profile] chief-cheerio.livejournal.com 2012-01-13 01:51 pm (UTC)(link)
"I'd fire the person," Quinn said instantly. "The longer you wait, the worse it looks. I guess I might feel a little bad about losing them, if they were good at their job, but better they go down than I do. I might fire the people who covered for them, too, depending on how much they knew and when."
Edited 2012-01-13 13:51 (UTC)

Re: Scenario 1

[identity profile] zetabetabrat.livejournal.com 2012-01-13 03:22 pm (UTC)(link)
"Fire her," Rebecca said at once, despite looking less than thrilled about vocally agreeing with Quinn. "As publicly as possible. Yeah, it'll ruin her, but at least it's on your own terms."
momslilassassin: ([neg] ben will jack you up)

Re: Scenario 1

[personal profile] momslilassassin 2012-01-13 06:03 pm (UTC)(link)
If this was home, Daala would probably have the person dropped into carbonite, then shipped off somewhere by Mandalorians, Ben thought sourly.

"You tell what you know as soon as you can," he said, "because the truth always comes out somehow. And they get fired."

Re: Scenario 1

[identity profile] exactlyaverage.livejournal.com 2012-01-13 07:41 pm (UTC)(link)
"Yeah, you have to come to terms with the advisor right off the bat and let him go if you expect to win anything with the pubilc," Jack said leaning back in his chair. "And then issue a statement or something about how you didn't know anything about it or whatever."

Re: Scenario 1

[identity profile] squire-hand.livejournal.com 2012-01-14 04:16 am (UTC)(link)
"Demote or censure," he said. "Termination or imprisonment as an option, depending on the severity. News need not be national, but I would let slip to those who would spread the news."
wrongkindofsith: (Your mouth moves and nonsense comes out)

Re: Scenario 2

[personal profile] wrongkindofsith 2012-01-13 03:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Cara let slip a reflexive smirk of amusement at the idea of anyone being able to torture information out of a Mord'Sith, even if she couldn't actually use that in an 'universal' answer.

"An enemy that has no familiarity was torture and lacks those with suitable training for it wouldn't be able to get useful information, especially not in a timely manner," she said. "Additionally, anyone I led should have at the very least rudimentary training in techniques to avoid being broken." Even if it would likely be woefully lacking by her standards.

"If rescue is a feasible option, loyalty demands that it should be attempted," she added. "Still if a rescue is out of the question then we can avenge them."

Re: Scenario 2

[identity profile] whateverknight.livejournal.com 2012-01-13 04:45 pm (UTC)(link)
"A rescue attempt would already be planned," Squall answered thoughtfully. "Especially if we're outgunned enough that we already lost a battle. Trained fighters are extremely valuable -- I don't like using cannon fodder. If the enemy is using torture, which is usually ineffective, that makes the situation less urgent tactically, but more urgent ethically, so that's more or less a wash."

As for the actual tactics of the operation, that one was a given. "Troops will be sent in three-person teams to secure the camp. I myself will lead the main strike force."
longislandiceme: (serious)

Re: Scenario 2

[personal profile] longislandiceme 2012-01-13 05:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, this was a scenario Bobby was pretty intimately familiar with, seeing as it happened just about once a month, it seemed. "I don't leave people behind, even if there's no torture involved." Bobby said firmly. "I'd send a small tactical team in- if I don't think my regular troops have the skills needed, I'd team up call in those who I know do have the skills or the experience."

Re: Scenario 2

[identity profile] exactlyaverage.livejournal.com 2012-01-13 07:46 pm (UTC)(link)
"Well, the best thing to do here is to make sure what you're hearing is right. So yeah, verification but also make sure you're doing is assessing the costs of what kind of battle you're going to get yourself into. Once you have that information then you can make an informed decision and start things in motion," Jack said leanin back in his chair.

Which was a pretty good answer for a guy who typically just runs into dangerous situations without thinking of his own safety.

Re: Scenario 3

[identity profile] inaskinnyway.livejournal.com 2012-01-13 02:02 pm (UTC)(link)
"First I would say that if the construction crew doesn't warn its volunteers that they would be on their own like that, they're stupid. But if my group is there to build homes, then it will build homes," Susan said simply. "It would perhaps be a lot of trial and error, but if a person injures themselves once or twice, they should have learned what not to do, at least. And it will be the best house it could possibly be because I have standards and they should, too."

She paused. "And whoever gave the construction crew food poisoning is fired." Even if she had no control over that. Too bad, fired anyway.

Re: Scenario 3

[identity profile] nonelikemesince.livejournal.com 2012-01-13 03:53 pm (UTC)(link)
As if ample experience and qualifications were ever the sort of concerns that stopped Anakin from doing things when he had his mind set on them?

"Of course I'd make sure my group did the job," he said promptly, looking mulishly determined about it. "Walking away when there's people who need that house is completely out of the question, and it can't be that hard to get a hold of instructions they can use."

He'd do it all himself, if the rest of the group wasn't up to the task and he had to.

Re: Scenario 3

[identity profile] whateverknight.livejournal.com 2012-01-13 04:54 pm (UTC)(link)
"Construction of a house is not a simple skill," Squall decided. "The first thing to try is to look for other experts that may volunteer or can be hired. If need be, they can assist via teleconference. Unfortunately, if a suitable expert isn't available, it would not be a good idea to try to build the house on our own. We will change our plans to return on a day when the experts are not sick."
wwiii: (Neutral)

Re: Scenario 3

[personal profile] wwiii 2012-01-14 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
Warren gave his shoulders a shrug. Maybe his answer was kind of simplistic, but...

"I wouldn't try to talk people through building a house on my own. That would be way too much like the blind leading the blind, even if I do have some experience with more basic structures after some volunteer work in Arceria," he noted. "But there's no reason I can't just hire out a different construction crew and go ahead with the plans to build that way. We said we were going to build a house, so... We're going to build a house."

Easy.

Re: Scenario 4

[identity profile] chief-cheerio.livejournal.com 2012-01-13 01:54 pm (UTC)(link)
"Yeah, you need to swap out the routine," Quinn conceded. "It would be a giant pain in the ass, but if you figured out it was stolen it's just a matter of time until the judges do too, and that can get you DQ'd. It would just mean extra practices, and whoever was left over from the previous captain and" -- air quotes -- "'forgot' to tell me would be at the bottom of the pyramid for the rest of the season."

Re: Scenario 4

[identity profile] zetabetabrat.livejournal.com 2012-01-13 03:20 pm (UTC)(link)
"Definitely change the routine, but I don't see why you wouldn't get a specialist," Rebecca said serenely, examining her nails as she spoke. "You can bog that down with enough paperwork for people to have to keep their mouths shut. And meanwhile, keep holding normal practices at the usual time, so you can have those on film in case anyone thinks something's up. Just start training discreetly with the specialist somewhere else, at someone's house while their parents are out or something."

Rebecca played to win, dammit.

Re: TAs

[identity profile] zetabetabrat.livejournal.com 2012-01-13 02:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Huh. This actually sounded kind of cool. Rebecca was around, mainly working out some of the scenarios in her head when she wasn't actively participating in conversations.
longislandiceme: (hanging out on rooftops)

Re: TAs

[personal profile] longislandiceme 2012-01-13 03:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Vision? Bobby had that one covered already, thanks. Sure, it wasn't a vision or a mission statement he'd come up with, but he did feel pretty strongly about it, so he figured it counted. In any case, he was around if anyone needed to bounce some ideas off him. Or just talk.

Re: OOC

[identity profile] hoorayimrich.livejournal.com 2012-01-13 02:06 pm (UTC)(link)
FLYCLOOOOOPPPPPSSSSSS!